The Revelation


As I posted earlier, eschatology keeps rearing its head in several areas of my life lately (more on that later), and so I undertook another detailed look at the Revelation, this time transcribing it and working through Chilton's magnificent commentary on the book.

Just a few thoughts:

1. The book has very little to say about the end of the world.

2. The book has a lot to say about the end of the world--the old world, that is. It is so very obviously primarily concerned with the fall of Jerusalem and the end of the Old Covenant.

3. The similarities and parallel structure to Ezekiel's prophecy are staggering. Why was I never taught this?

4. I tend to agree with the hypothesis that the prophecy was meant to be read liturgically and not all at once.

5. Once one is familiar with the Bible's style of prophetic symbolism (another post on that soon too), the Revelation is not confusing in any way. It's actually very, very clear.

6. It's also very complex, in that the information communicated is very compact. There's much more to it than a quick reading will bring to mind, at least for those of us who aren't as Biblically literate as we should be (like yours truly).

7. There is no "battle of Armageddon." It doesn't ever happen, and there is no place called "Armageddon."

8. Chapter 19 ain't the Second Coming. John sees heaven opened, and Jesus seated on a horse. He doesn't "come" (go) anywhere.

9. The whole point is that Jesus rules, NOW, and we will be victorious in this present age.

10. We're very obviously living in the so-called "millennium." I don't see how anyone can not get that.

Bonus: Man, Dispensationalism is kooky. ;^)

4 comments:

jenni said...

If only YOU had taught my high school Bible classes. Keep the blogs comin', please...

Chris Eh? said...

I'm confused...at what point do people turn into angels? This doesn't sound like Left Behind to me. That Kirk Cameron is so wacky.

Robert said...

You're right there is no place called Armageddon, but they may be referring to Megiddo. Susan C Anthony blogged about it at: http://www.susancanthony.com/AboutIsrael/Megiddo.html

Johnny! said...

St. John is definitely referring to both Megiddo and the mountains, thus the conflation of the two. What he isn't referring to is some future world-ending battle. Especially given that in the Revelation that battle doesn't ever take place.